Design 1
The first design is similar to a JCB digger.
Advantages:
- The use of 4 heavy duty wheels help it to move through rough terrain without being assembled and dissassembled constantly.
- A pivot above the base allows the boom to swivel to discard of picked up material.
- A scoop like connection at the front can move gravel and multiple smaller objects with ease.
- A hydraulic system can be utilised easily at the touch of a button.
Disadvantages:
- Using wheels in this manner may leave the crane unstable and likely to topple upon picking up large weights.
- The scoop would be useless when confronted with a large solid beam.
- Many parts of this design would be extremely heavy when disassembled, making carrying the individual parts impossible.
Design 2
Advantages:
- A strong sturdy base would give a good platform for the crane to operate.
- A hydraulic system could lift the boom up and down quickly.
- The vaccuum operated suction device would be able to attach to most objects.
Disadvantages:
- The crane is completely immobile.
- There is no means to transfer it's load apart from vertically, work would have to be done and then the load would be set back down again.
- If such a vacuum system was available, it would be likely to be very expensive.
Design 3
Advantages:
- 'Spider' legs would provide good support on rough terrain and could easily be attached.
- A strong winch mechanism can be attached easily onto the framework to provide a good lifting force.
- The holding mechanism would be able to grasp objects quickly with strength.
Disadvantages:
- The crane is stationary which is unpractical.
- Upon grasping a load, the 'claw' mechanism would not be very efficient in keeping a grip on it.
- Another system such as a pivot would be useful to move the load out of the way.
thanks for sharing for your important information and i read your totally blog. it is very helpful
ReplyDeleteclick here